|
Spotlight
Making room for flexibility
India,
the land of diversity, is also a land of extremes. For years it has attracted
both the hippie wayfarer who lives on Rs 100 per day and the luxurist who shells
out nearly US$ 1000 per night. The Golden Triangle at one time was literally
worth gold to hoteliers. Domestic tourists, now, are making a dash to South
East Asia rather than exploring their own backyard.
While hoteliers made hay while the sun shone and kept room rates as high as
possible in the face of high demand, this buoyancy has now disappeared due to
various factors. A telling example is a city like Bengaluru, where once-skyrocketing
rates plummeted when the inventory increased and the airport moved to the city
outskirts. Suddenly the travel industry is reeling under the weight of its own
short sightedness as occupancies sag.
Downward spiral

R Parthiban
|

Mukesh Jagga
|
Flexibility is the key, said a Middle East based hotelier
when asked why it decided to slash room rates in the face of the current economic
crisis. "To fill rooms rather than hold on to rates in the face of abysmal
occupancies," he added. So rates have crashed the world over. According
to FHRAI, the room rates have been slashed by approximately 20 to 25 per cent
over the last few months. This, with no substantial increase in occupancies.
A reason being that prices have fallen to the same or to a greater extent across
the world, hence not allowing a competitive advantage to India. If we are cheap,
they are cheaper. According to the latest Hotel Price Index from global hotel
specialist Hotels.com, the average price of a hotel room, globally, fell by
12 per cent last year (for the period October to December 2008, compared to
the same period the year before). Mumbai topped the list of biggest falls in
hotel prices around the world, with a drop of 41 per cent, in the wake of a
sharp fall in demand for the city's hotels following the terrorist attacks.
Other cities around the world too experienced substantial declines (see table).
The key question that emerges here is whether the decrease in tariff by hotels
is enough to save the tourism sector?
Reasons
and excuses

Patu Keswani
|

Himmat Anand
|
Hotel development in India for decades has focused only on
the luxury segment, with inns, guesthouses and local hotels left to cater to
the middle segment. The concept of upscale and no-frills hotels was practically
non-existent in the country till a couple of years back. "The gap between
the five-stars and guesthouses in the country has always been enormous. It is
only of late that the upscale and mid-market model has evolved in the country,"
says Patu Keswani, chairman, Lemon Tree Hotels.
Over the years, we have lost traffic to countries like Thailand, Malaysia or
Singapore, primarily because of their competitive pricing. The middle-class
segment, which forms a bulk of travellers in most of the countries, has remained
practically untapped in India.
The glaring mismatch in demand and supply has also been a
perennial reason to justify high room rates. Himmat Anand, MD of Diethelm Travel
India, feels that in the past hotels have got away with this reason. "Most
of the hotels in the country do not offer quality for what they charge. As compared
to the neighbouring destinations, Indian hotels charge 30 to 40 per cent more.
We have got away in the past because of the gap between demand and supply. But
now, when the demand is down, the strength of character of the hotels will be
tested."

Param Kannampilly
|

Rajeev Kohli
|
However, Param Kannampilly, chairman, Concept Hospitality,
feels that hotels, alone, are not to be blamed. He explains, "Let's take
a case. Leela won a bid for a plot of land in Delhi for Rs 611 crores. It will
be impossible for one to break-even in a project like this unless you charge
a tariff of US$300-400 per day. Hotels have no other option but to go for a
high tariff, otherwise it will take ages for them to break-even." But how
about those hotels that have been present for decades before the realty bubble,
charging exorbitant rack rates even today?
However, the onus does not lie on the hoteliers alone. A tough visa regime,
lack of tourist friendly infrastructure as other countries scramble to build
man made wonders and dole out visas on arrival to visitors, and the prevailing
volatile political and security situation are further hindrances.
Lost opportunities

S P Jain
|
Many in the trade are of the opinion that the hospitality
sector did not take a strong stand on room rates, when it was the need of the
hour (in December 2008, post attacks). Only after the Visit India Year was initiated,
did hoteliers come together and announce cuts in rates and packages to attract
inbound traffic. But, the reality is that the promotions are a case of too little
too late. Rajeev Kohli, director, Creative Travels, and VP, Indian Convention
Promotion Bureau (ICPB), says that hotels lost an opportunity to counter the
low occupancies by not slashing the rates immediately after the attacks. "They
played a wait and watch game and realised only after two months that it is imperative
for them to slash the rates. However, by then it was too late as the off-season
was about to begin."
The Indian Premier league (IPL) was a golden opportunity for hoteliers to cash
in on the lean season- an ultimately, which withered away for no fault of the
industry. SP Jain, chairman, Pride Hotels, and president, Hotel And Restaurant
Association (Western India), feels that the shift of the IPL from India to South
Africa will have an adverse effect on the hotel sector. Due to the cancellation
of the IPL, I foresee a further 15 to 20 per cent downfall in inbound tourism,"
he says.
What is the intrinsic factor that caused this heartburn?
"We have a tendency to wait till the last minute and react only when our
backs are against the wall. For the current off-season we started acting only
in January or February. Instead, we should have put a strategy in place by September
last year," says Anand. He adds, "One needs to market packages much
in advance. We have a tendency to announce the packages a few days before we
actually begin to offer them. A proper planning and perception is required on
an immediate basis."
|
Hotel
|
Destination
|
Tariff
|
Date of booking
|
| Le Royal Meridien |
Mumbai (India)
US$201 - 465 |
ranging from approx |
July, 1 2009 |
| Le Royal Meridien |
Bangkok (Thailand)
US$158 - 257 |
ranging from approx |
July, 1 2009 |
Park Hyatt Goa
Resort and Spa |
Goa
US$ 151 - 242 |
ranging from |
1-Oct-09 |
Hyatt Regency
Hua Hin |
Thailand
US$ 127 - 209 |
ranging from |
1-Oct-09 |
Conversion Rate Used:
One Indian Rupee= 0.020198 US$
One Thai Baht = 0.028265 US$ |
Visit India- a hype?
The much-hyped Visit India 2009 scheme promised attractive packages to foreign
tourists visiting the country from April to December 2009. The scheme mentioned
that it would provide a one night complimentary stay in the hotel that the tourist
books.
Is this the panacea that can help the industry tide over this year? Most of
the tour operators are far from happy with the scheme. "There is a lack
of clarity in the conditions laid down in the scheme," says R Parthiban,
director, Swagatam Tours. It is still not clear about which hotels will be included
in the scope- more importantly, which category. Moreover, the number of rooms
that a particular tour operator can book in a hotel for an international group
varies in every hotel.
Also, lack of price integrity exacerbates the situation. A renowned tour operator
in Mumbai who did not wish to be named, claims, "There is no consistency
in the prices quoted by the hotels. Numerous hotels set artificially high rack
rates on which they offer discount. It has been often observed that the discounted
price offered by hotels doesn't differ much from the bargained rate prevailing
in the market." Therefore, even the discounted prices do not cater to the
masses. In such a scenario, occupancies are bound to suffer and the scheme might
not save the tourism sector.
The hotel industry has to pull up its socks to prepare for the season ahead.
According to Jain, the chief focus of the hotels should be on domestic tourists
during this off-season. "It is important to please domestic tourists. We
need to take a leaf out of China's booklet, where tourism has done extremely
well owing primarily to domestic tourists," he says.
The new government also needs to step in to take a decisive role, rather than
push the tourism ministry on the backburner. Jain adds, "We are willing
to offer a further 15 to 20 per cent on tariff but for that we need active support
from the Government. Even after paying high prices to acquire land, we need
to obtain many licenses, which involves cost and time. The Government must smoothen
the process of permissions first."
According to Kannampilly, the need of the hour is to have proper infrastructure
in place. "If the Government can put proper infrastructure in place, the
project costs and costs of operation will drastically come down, which will
surely bring a fall in tariff," he says.
From the lessons learnt in the past six months, there is a need to sacrifice
earnings in the short term for survival in the long-term. Mukesh Jagga, former
president, Association of Domestic Tour Operators of India (ADTOI) and chairman
of Viva Holidays Tours and Travels feels that the key is to be consistent. "The
prevailing rates should be intact even during the peak season. If we go back
to the same old ways in October, then both the hotels and the tour operators
will lose the trust of the travellers." And it is this trust that will
build a strong foundation for the future.
|