|
Hari
Dewnani
Head (HR & Admin),
ANZ Travels
There are many factors to the zero per cent commission issue. One, the
airlines haven't analysed the market scenario as they should have. Supply
has multiplied, but the demand has remained more or less constant. This
has led to lopsided growth, for which the only party to be blamed are
the airlines.
Why should the agent have to suffer if the airlines miscalculated?
For all that they have been screaming hoarse about increasing costs and
mounting losses, why are they still in business? We have had instances
in the past where airlines have shut shop. If the airlines feel that cutting
agent commissions will be the end to their problems, they are mistaken.
Another claim by the airlines is that zero commissions are practiced globally.
Are they fooling agents by saying so? What about markets that still practice
the nine per cent regime, like Japan? The US and Europe have been cited
as examples of markets that work on a nil commission model, but if we
analyse the scenario we will see that no airline in the US is making money,
despite having cut off the agent.
The Indian market needs some breathing time; it isn't
even fully credit card-enabled. It's ironical - the relationship between
the agent and the airline has been reduced to master and slave, when it
initially began with full support from our side. Despite all this, the
airlines still stand by the fact that agents are their primary distributors.
|