|
In Focus
Arresting air disasters
Airports worldwide are bracing themselves for disasters that
may arise from unforeseen circumstances by adopting suitable technologies. Does
India have its systems in place?
The recent TAM Airlines crash in Brazil is just one more of the flight mishaps
that the world has been witnessing of late. The aircraft careened off the runway
upon landing at Sao Paulo's Congonhas airport in heavy rain killing all 186
passengers and crew aboard the Airbus 320, along with a number of people on
the ground.
According to the Montreal-based International Federation
of Air Traffic Controllers Associations, air safety is currently compromised
and is a danger to the travelling public. Brazil has come under heavy criticism
over air safety after the TAM Airlines revealed that the jetliner in the country's
worst air disaster had part of its braking equipment switched off at the time
of the accident.
Eye-opener
Whatever the case may be, this should serve as an eye-opener for airports in
India. The reason is simple; none of the runways in the country's airports are
equipped to prevent major aircraft mishaps.
Technology is the only means of countering such disasters - a technology that
acts as a buffer to slow down aircraft that overrun the length of the runway.
The EMAS technology or the Engineered Material Arresting Systems developed jointly
by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and ESCO (Engineered Arresting
Systems Corporation) in 1998 after numerous real time aircraft tests is made
up of a bed of cellular cement material that crushes under the weight of an
aircraft, resulting in guaranteed deceleration of the aircraft.
A standard EMAS arrestor bed extends around 600 feet from the end of the runway.
At most commercial airports the RSA (Runway Safety Area) is 500 feet wide and
extends 1,000 feet beyond each end of the runway. Such technology is useful
in cases where there is a shortage of land and it is not possible to have the
standard 1,000 feet overrun.
The most dangerous of these incidents are overruns, but since
many airports were built before the 1,000-foot RSA length was adopted some 20
years ago, the area beyond the end of the runway is where many airports cannot
achieve the full standard RSA. During the monsoons, landing distance is increased
by more than 20 per cent, but no runway in India is that long. This only increases
the chances of an accident, although the Airports Authority of India (AAI) has
claimed that all runways in India meet international standards.
- FAA-approved as equivalent to standard
runway safety area (RSA)
- Permits reduction of standard RSA for RW
extension within airport
- Shortens standard RSA to 600 feet with
vertical guidance
- First and only system to meet FAA AC 150/5220-22
- Features material customised to each runway's
aircraft fleet mix that readily and predictably crushes the weight of
an overrunning aircraft
- Developed jointly by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) and ESCO; approved in 1998 after numerous real-time
aircraft tests
- After arrestment, ARFF vehicles can easily
maneuver in and out of ruts on EMAS surface
|
Concrete solutions
In July 1998, when the technology was set in place, Jane Garvey, the FAA administrator,
was quoted as saying, "FAA engineers helped develop a new technology (EMAS)
that will increase airport runway safety, protecting people and aircraft during
overrun accidents."
The front of the EAMS includes a grade-break that transitions the aircraft into
the concrete material. The arrestor bed set-back is increased on long runway
safety areas and the system is sized for 70-knot performance. Beyond the runway
width, the sides of the EMAS are stepped to provide emergency vehicle access
and passenger egress. EMAS length, depth and strength are varied to provide
optimum performance. As the aircraft traverses the bed, the wheels crush the
EMAS material creating a tire/material interface that provides the resistive
loads to decelerate the aircraft. The load is placed on the aircraft landing
gear and support structure. The level of performance depends primarily on the
landing gear strength and the runway safety area available. While snow and winter
weather conditions do not affect EMAS performance, snow is easily removed with
equipment designed for use on the bed.
EMAS arrestments
There have been four incidents in the US where the technology has worked successfully
to keep aircraft from overrunning the runway:
- May 1999: A Saab 340 commuter aircraft overran
the runway at JFK
- May 2003: Gemini Cargo MD-11 was safely decelerated
at JFK
- January 2005: A Boeing 747 overran the runway
at JFK
- July 2006: Mystere Falcon 900 airplane ran
off the runway at the Greenville Downtown Airport in South Carolina
Presently, the EMAS system developed by ESCO using crushable concrete is the
only system that meets the FAA standard. FAA is currently in the process of
conducting research through the Airport Cooperative Research Program (project
number 07-03) that will examine alternatives to the existing approved system,
the results of which are expected in 2009.
|