|
Cover Story
Nowhere in the picture
The Indian film industry has, for long, been the fancy of
National Tourist Offices (NTOs) of various destinations promoting themselves
in India but a closer probe by Reema Sisodia reveals that their success
has as much to do with the apathy of the bureaucracy of India's central and
state tourism boards to recognise the opportunity in their own backyard
Scene from the film Gangster shot
on location in Korea
|
They came, they saw, they conquered. This has been the case
with India since time immemorial. It needs the world to recognise her true potential
and in this case, it is clearly the NTOs of several destinations that have trained
a keen eye on the Indian tourist. They have clenched the catchword Bollywood
with a firm fist and have encashed on it. They have realised the power and reach
this industry has in showcasing their destination, which in turn leads to an
increase in tourism traffic to their region. For NTOs, Bollywood is truly their
golden goose.
NTOs on top
Switzerland Tourism admits and accepts the contribution of Yash Raj Films in
making their destination popular, while Korea Tourism Organisation (KTO) has
thanked Vishesh Film for choosing Korea as the destination for the shoot of
their film Gangster. Hyo Sik Jeon, director, KTO, on his recent visit to India,
announced special support for filmmakers to shoot in Korea. "In view of
its wide reach and strong following both domestically and internationally, KTO
intends to get the Indian film fraternity to shoot at its tourist attractions
and showcase the same," stated Jeon. Harshad Mehta, honorary consul of
the Republic of Armenia in India, has also expressed strong intentions of promoting
Armenia through films and has also taken the efforts of showcasing the product
to prominent film makers from India.
All
NTOs, right from Switzerland Tourism which was the first to tap the potential,
to the other major players in the Indian market like Singapore, Australia, Mauritius,
Malaysia, South Africa and recent entrants like Ireland, Korea, Armenia, Bavaria,
Brazil, etc are aggressively wooing Bollywood with strategic and meticulously
planned marketing and promotional campaigns. Brazil, for instance, recently
waived off visa fees for a film that was shot in Rio de Jenario. Seamless and
hassle-free rules, easy permits and procedures coupled with attractive deals,
benefits and incentives and much more are part of the package promoted by NTOs
to lure Indian film makers to their respective destinations.
In a nutshell, this is what NTOs have to offer in general:
1. Single window clearance for all permits and rules for shooting.
2. Exclusive policy designed specifically for Indian film producers.
3. Free locations for shoots, concessions at sites.
4. State-of-the-art equipment and technical support provided free or at a highly
subsidised rate.
5. Free airfare and accommodation.
6. Waiver of visa fees.
7. Support from airlines in terms of baggage allowance.
Says Kiran V Shantaram, producer, director and chairman, V Shantaram Foundation,
"International destinations have gone all out to capture the attention
of the Indian film fraternity. From user friendly rules and procedures to a
hassle-free functioning method, shooting abroad is far more pleasant than in
India. Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, etc, have provided attractive packages."
The Indian scene
|
Filmmakers are unanimous in voicing that shooting in
India is a very difficult process. There is no single window clearance
for the innumerable permits and other criteria that one has to get into
place before starting work
|
Correspondingly India, which is blessed with one of the world's
most diverse topography, comprising of breathtaking landscapes and rich culture,
heritage and art, has not even looked at this potential. Each state has a plethora
of diverse attractions and can easily catapult India as a top destination for
film shoots both for the domestic and international market. Ideally, India should
have done what the NTOs have been doing, using Bollywood as a tool to promote
the country domestically and internationally. Though films are being shot in
various parts of the country, filmmakers are unanimous in voicing that shooting
in India is a very difficult process. There is no single window clearance for
the innumerable permits and other criteria that one has to get into place before
starting work. Says Mukesh Bhatt, managing director, Vishesh Films, "It
is a sad affair when it comes to shooting in India, especially in Mumbai. Bureaucracy,
corruption and basically the entire system, is a nightmare for producers. Shooting
abroad is comparatively economical and the product on offer is much more superior,
such as beautiful streets, and clean and picture perfect locales as compared
to the unclean streets of Mumbai. An international destination with their attractive
packages is a dream for Indian film makers."
According to Shantaram, it is the high number of permits which one requires
from various agencies for a film shoot that is painful. He says, "To shoot
in a city like Mumbai, at say the Gateway of India, one needs to have permits
from the following authorities: ASI, (Archaeological Survey of India), Navy,
Police, the local police station (Colaba), MTDC (Maharashtra Tourism Development
Corporation), BMC (Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation), RTO (Regional Transport
Office), Traffic Police and host of others. Co-ordinating with all the authorities
and the process of getting these permits can be a very lengthy and highly de-motivating."
Bhatt goes a step further and totally blames the system for its bureaucracy,
red tapism and corrupt practices. He says, "It is extremely frustrating
to film in India especially in Maharashtra and Mumbai. We receive zero support
from the authorities and over and above that have to bribe authorities for permits,
which hikes up the cost of production. Unfriendly infrastructure, badly maintained
locations also add up to the agony. It is high time we take a serious call on
the system and have a straight and user friendly system in place, like it is
prevalent internationally." Bhatt is also of the opinion that the states
only have plans and incentives on paper, if there are any in the first place.
Jayaraman, chief executive officer, Exotique Expeditions, a New Delhi based
tour company, specialising in facilitating overseas film producers cites an
unpleasant experience while assisting a team of Philippines-based film makers
to shoot their serial Extra Challenge at various locations in the Golden Triangle,
including Fatehpur Sirkri and Taj Mahal. "The entire system is in a mess
and we had to run in circles to get certain permits since ASI was involved.
The run around for permits and sanctions was so tedious that the filmmakers
gave up and we have yet to recover our deposit of Rs 50,000 from ASI. Further,
the hotels are over priced, the entire infrastructure is an issue," states
Jayaraman. According to him, encouraging international filmmakers to come to
India for shoots is great business opportunity for the travel trade as well
as tourism promotion of India at large. "The system has to change and requires
vision from leaders and political will," opines Jayaraman.
Echoing
a similar thought is filmmaker Ashok Pandit. Says Pandit, "The beauty of
Kashmir is unmatched and used to be the most sought after destination for film
shooting through the 60s and right till the time the state was rocked with insurgency
problem. When the conditions were right, the destination was over priced, but
then filmmakers had to succumb to the demands. Today the destination needs to
make serious efforts to rope in filmmakers. While the Kashmir government has
invited film producers to shoot in the region, they have not supported the move
with the providing the necessary confidence. I am extremely keen on shooting
my next film there as the script requires a Kashmir background, and I am hoping
for complete support from the authorities."
India has the potential
India can adopt the thought process of the NTOs, of marketing
the country through the medium of cinema in conjunction with the highly successful
Incredible India campaign. This strategy would not only work wonders in providing
the country much needed exposure, but also help increase the visitor numbers.
Suresh Chablani, CEO, Rose Travels, which has been the official travel agency
for a host of film producers and banners, opines that Bollywood and the regional
cinema can be a vital tool in building brand India and destination marketing
to boost tourism. "Today while the world is looking at India, it is the
best time for India tourism and the state tourism boards to realise that films
can be highly instrumental in showcasing the potential of the country to the
world. We too have good locations and facilities like Ramoji Film City, for
international film makers to come here and shoot," states Chablani. He
further adds, "It is also a great business avenue for the trade as on an
average a film unit comprises of 50 people depending on where the shoot is taking
place. On an average there are about 24 films which are shot per year, if not
more, and this can be a good mode of business. The increase in tourist traffic,
both international and domestic, once destinations are popularised by films
will also be a big boost of revenue for the trade.
Rajeev Talwar, additional director general tourism, government of India, agrees
to the bureaucratic and technical bottlenecks. Says Talwar, "We definitely
need to be more proactive and take the right steps to assist film makers and
make India a preferred location for shoots. It is unfortunate that film makers
have been facing difficulty in their work and it is important to provide the
right environment which includes easy, smooth and time saving facilities for
shooting. But I would like to state that more than concessions and subsidies
emphasis should be first on making the process for film shooting convenient
and easy."
Initiatives taken in India
Very few in India have realised the potential of promoting the destination through
films and unfortunately their efforts have been stuck on the decision table.
In an attempt to capitalise on the tourism boom caused by cinema, Centre for
Media & Entertainment Studies (CMES) had organised a cinematic conclave
to promote Chandigarh and the northern states of Punjab and Haryana as ideal
destinations for film shoots. Attended by stalwarts of the film industry, the
conclave sought to ignite the imagination of the Mumbai film and television
industry in opting to shoot in these regions and provide an impetus to cinematic
tourism. A host of measures were announced which included setting up of an office
in north India providing a single window clearance for film projects, access
and information on the Web so that production houses in Mumbai can initiate
and get clearances processed online, joint promotions by Chandigarh, Punjab,
Haryana and Himachal in the form of consolidated cinematic tourism packages,
etc.
|
Punjab alone has 99 heritage sites.
All these sites have been opened for shooting at nominal rates with a
single window clearance.
The state government provides 50 per cent entertainment tax exemption
for all films produced in Punjabi
|
During the conclave Jagjit Puri, managing director, Punjab
tourism, said, "The aim of this conclave is to interact with the film and
television industry, understand their needs and find out their problems. It
is an integrated effort to promote north India. Punjab alone has 99 heritage
sites. All these sites have been opened for shooting at nominal rates with a
single window clearance. The state government provides 50 per cent entertainment
tax exemption for all films produced in Punjabi."
According to sources from Uttar Pradesh (UP) tourism, the film policy of the
state called Film Bandhu provides a rebate of 40 per cent in the
tariff of government tourist bungalows and 25 per cent discount on Public Works
Department (PWD) cottages. Free security arrangements, entertainment tax exceptions
for films, which are shot 75 per cent or more in UP and nominal charge for using
the air strip for shooting are some of the other incentives offered by the film
policy. Maharashtra has also set up subsidies four months ago but only for Marathi
films shot in Maharashtra. For a 35 mm cinemascope colour Dolby Digital Sound
(DDS), the Maharashtra government gives 30 lakhs to the producer, while 25 lakhs
are offered for non-DDS films. Jammu & Kashmir tourism has also announced
special benefits for shooting in the state and Rajasthan is yet another state,
which has a film tourism policy in place.
Though states have their policies in place, how effective and streamlined they
are is yet to be seen. Pandit says, "All these policies are there, but
they seem to be workable only on paper. We want policies that are real and completely
free from bureaucratic hassles." Jayaraman sums up the bottomline for film
tourism, "It will result in more business for travel agents and tour operators.
In this light we are aiming to expand our business to promote India to international
film makers and hope that the systems and infrastructure will improve to benefit
tourism in India in the long run." Hence its time India wakes up
to this idea.
An all-inclusive tourism policy specifically designed
for the film industry needs to be formed to provide the right aid for film
shooting.
- International film producers need to be
encouraged.
- Promoting India through Indian films is
also a resourceful proposition to boost tourism.
- An initiative in the form of 'Locations',
a film tourism event, was sponsored by Chhattisgarh tourism board in
2003. This initiative did not materialise in concrete results. More
such interactive meets should be organised.
- During his tenure, Jayatilak, former MD,
Chhattisgarh tourism board, had suggested setting up of a specialised
agency catering to the film industry, activation of the single window
clearance system and drafting of a film policy. However, after is exit,
his plans and initiatives failed to take off.
- Regional films can play a major role in
intra-state tourism. Hence the states need to showcase their products
to the regional filmmakers.
- Infrastructure development, including
increase in accommodation facilities, better transport systems will
help to facilitate filmmakers.
- Recently, the northern states joined hands
to organise a cinematic conclave. More such activities should take place.
- Airfares need to be reduced, while railways
need to give quotas for the film industry.
- No charge for cameras at historical sites.
|
|