|
The war in Iraq comes at a time when
the airlines, having accumulated US$ 30 billion of losses
since 9/11, are still struggling with the effects of the worst
crisis in the history of the industry, IATA has said. The
armed conflict could easily add US$ 10 billion dollars of
losses on international traffic by extending the current traffic
slump well into the summer season.
At this point, the air transport
industry must look beyond the horizon and re-invent itself,
said Giovanni Bisignani, IATA director general and CEO, in
Montreal, at the opening ceremony of the ICAO (International
Civil Aviation Organization) ATC5 Conference. Our industry
needs a change, but, government regulation keeps our industry
from changing. This ICAO conference may well represent the
last chance to set our industry on the right regulatory track,
Bisignani stressed.
IATA has identified three obstacles
to the change the industry needs:
- The bilateral system
- National ownership rules and
- The attitude of competition authorities.
These are the three pillars of stagnation.
In a number of position papers presented to the ICAO Conference,
IATA outlines the measures that the airlines propose in order
to bring about relevant changes the industry requires.
Bilateralism should evolve
into a regional system with the merger of single markets.
While the North Atlantic could be the starting point in seeking
a new way, we call on all like-minded governments to begin
the modernisation of the bilateral system. Airlines should
be free to merge and approach international financial markets
for capital. The wave of globalisation must eliminate national
ownership limits wherever they represent an obstacle to development.
These limits are denying airlines the freedom of action given
to all other businesses, Bisignani added.
IATA is well aware that for many
developing countries, a national airline may be considered
an attribute of sovereignty and a necessary asset for its
economic development. Some states may wish to keep a
golden share to make sure their national interests
are taken into account. Fine. We simply ask these states not
to create obstacles for those who wish to liberalise further,
Bisignani pointed out.
Dogmatic competition policies combined
with a lack of understanding of how air transport operates
on the part of the competition authorities also restrict the
airlines freedom to cooperate or to merge. What
other global business is more fragmented than air transport?
We need the economies of scales that mergers or acquisitions
can provide with the proper competition supervision. The regulators
must take up the challenge of change, Bisignani concluded.
|